Did you by any chance attend the prestigious Retard School at Michigan? You are hilarious. And by hilarious, I mean terrible beyond all comprehension.

You win.

Against State, he had 4 rushes for 4 yards. He had a pretty good day passing, but it wasn’t “OMG he’s amazing,” which he most certainly was at the beginning of the year.

I think Clark’s a great player, and you’ve blown one simple observation about his play in about 3 games completely out of proportion (I guess in typical Penn State fashion, what with being a fanbase that unironically uses terms like “referines”).

20-36, 240 yards, 2 TD, 1 int, 125 pass eff.

“and pedestrian against Michigan State”

16-26, 341 yards, 4 TD, 223 pass eff.

Stop drinking from your air conditioner. You can fill a tanker with the dumb in your posts.

Was he snapping out of the funk in that bowl game? Hopefully for Penn State. Was he in a funk before that? Absolutely. It may have been lingering effects from the concussion (the non-long-term effects usually take a couple months to clear up), and I’m not predicting he’ll be bad next year at all.

Stop being obsessed with Michigan, Penn State fans.

Also, I’m curious as to why you didn’t use the Illinois/Michigan game as the example for a Juice Williams “huge passing day”. Wouldn’t that game where Illinois “kicked the shiat out of” Michigan have been more familiar to your readers? But I guess facing Michigan’s 87th ranked pass defense, #9 in the conference, isn’t a true test.

Take your FAIL elsewhere, unless you want to use arguments that aren’t, like, stupid.

That takes care of the 2nd half of the Rose Bowl. What about the rest of the 2 1/2 games at the end of the season? That 152 rating wasn’t just for the 2nd half of the USC game.

“does Juice Williams’s huge passing day against Missouri make him a great passer?”

Clark was All Big 10 First Team QB. His last 3 games of the season were just as good as any from the 1st half of the season. He doesn’t need to have stats from any one game or half to illustrate him being a good QB.

But go ahead and spin it how you like. It’s your blog.

Ringer may have been overrated, but in Dantonio’s Supreme Offensive Gameplan, he didn’t see the need to, like, give any of the other guys the ball, so 1) they’re all less experienced than they should be, and 2) they’re all clearly inferior to Ringer, or they would have played.

In the last three games of the season, including against the #1 by far pass efficiency defense of USC, Clark was 57-98 for 854 yards, 8 tds, 3 ints for a passer rating of 152. I’m not sure how that is “tailing off”. He didn’t play well against Iowa after a concussion, but no QB is on for every contest.

Penn State did indeed lose their top 3 defensive ends, but the guy who is out with an ACL Pete Massaro is far from the #4 defensive end, this year or last year. Top 3 are Jerome Hayes, Jack Crawford, and Kevion Latham. All Big Ten DT Jared Odrick also lined up at DE in the B/W game.

You say that you see only 2 or 3 games that we will “most likely” lose. But what if you flip the question, and ask how many games we will “most likely” win?

I’ll give you Eastern, Indiana, and Delaware State. I think Western is closer to 60/40, but I’ll include that as well, if we’re being optimistic.

So, the odds are good that we will be 4-3 in games that are easy to predict. That gives us five games that are “toss ups.” If the toss-ups go 3-2 in our favor, we’re at 7-5. And this is the optimistic scenario.

For the pessimistic scenario, throw Iowa into the games we should lose, and Western into the toss up category. That puts us at 3-4 with five toss-ups. If the toss-ups cut 2-3 against us, we’re at 5-7.

I’m not sure where you can get “At worst 8-5″