<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Swept WMU, Tournament Number is 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umvarsityblue.com/2009/05/swept-wmu-tournament-number-is-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umvarsityblue.com/2009/05/swept-wmu-tournament-number-is-7/</link>
	<description>Covering Michigan Football and other sports in depth, with a focus on the the year long process of recruiting.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:22:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FormerlyAnonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.umvarsityblue.com/2009/05/swept-wmu-tournament-number-is-7/comment-page-1/#comment-7405</link>
		<dc:creator>FormerlyAnonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umvarsityblue.com/?p=4385#comment-7405</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d argue Sparty&#039;s choke job would be a bit surprising.  I think they do get swept by IU either way, not because they choke, but because IU is just a stronger team and Sparty being on the road.  I think they still take at least 2 of 3 from Purdue, or at least I really hope so.

Those changes were made to the post.  I think it was a mix of typos (OSU record) and checking the standings before they were officially updated on bigten.org (Minn).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d argue Sparty&#8217;s choke job would be a bit surprising.  I think they do get swept by IU either way, not because they choke, but because IU is just a stronger team and Sparty being on the road.  I think they still take at least 2 of 3 from Purdue, or at least I really hope so.</p>
<p>Those changes were made to the post.  I think it was a mix of typos (OSU record) and checking the standings before they were officially updated on bigten.org (Minn).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.umvarsityblue.com/2009/05/swept-wmu-tournament-number-is-7/comment-page-1/#comment-7395</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umvarsityblue.com/?p=4385#comment-7395</guid>
		<description>Good luck this weekend. Hope you can help us out, and obviously help yourself out. Would be weird not having you in the tourney... especially when Sparty of all teams seems headed.. though in typical MSU fashion they&#039;re choke this weekend, get swept by IU and you take the 6th seed over them. Watch.

For the record the top of the standings should be Illinoi 14-4, Minny 13-4, OSU 13-5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck this weekend. Hope you can help us out, and obviously help yourself out. Would be weird not having you in the tourney&#8230; especially when Sparty of all teams seems headed.. though in typical MSU fashion they&#8217;re choke this weekend, get swept by IU and you take the 6th seed over them. Watch.</p>
<p>For the record the top of the standings should be Illinoi 14-4, Minny 13-4, OSU 13-5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

