//

Programming Update

I am going to be out of town this weekend. Regular content should proceed as necessary, and I’m sure Paul will hold down the fort. However, if there are any breaking developments (especially in recruiting), we may be a bit behind in covering them.

Recruiting update this afternoon. Thanks for bearing with us.

Posted under Blog News

Upon Further Review: Illinois

The raw data is available in .xls format here. On individual player charts, the time played is now from the boxscore, rather than adding up to the second each player’s time played.

Half 1

1st half differential
Lineup Time on Floor Score Differential
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 7:10 15-12 +3
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Lee, Sims 2:08 0-2 -2
Merritt, Douglass, Lee, Novak, Gibson 2:24 4-4 0
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Gibson :43 0-2 -2
Grady, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Gibson 3:00 5-3 +2
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 4:31 7-7 0
Total 20:00 31-30 +1

Half 2

2nd half differential
Lineup Time on Floor Score Differential
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 1:46 3-2 +1
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Novak, Sims 4:01 3-7 -4
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 1:24 4-4 0
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Gibson 1:52 0-3 -3
Merritt, Douglass, Lee, Harris, Gibson :34 0-2 -2
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Harris, Sims 2:24 1-2 -1
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 1:46 3-2 +1
Grady, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 3:03 2-8 -6
Grady, Lee, Harris, Novak, Sims :23 0-1 -1
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims :16 0-0 0
Grady, Lee, Harris, Novak, Sims :40 3-2 +1
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims :51 0-1 -1
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Harris, Gibson :08 1-0 +1
Merritt, Douglass, Lee, Harris, Gibson :26 0-2 -2
Merritt, Douglass, Lee, Shepherd, Gibson :26 0-0 0
Total 20:00 20-36 -16

Game totals

Lineup Totals
Lineup Time on Floor Score Differential
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 16:20 28-24 +4
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Lee, Sims 2:08 0-2 -2
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 1:24 4-4 0
Grady, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Gibson 3:00 5-3 +2
Grady, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 3:03 2-8 -6
Merritt, Douglass, Lee, Novak, Gibson 2:24 4-4 0
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Gibson 1:35 0-5 -5
Merritt, Douglass, Lee, Harris, Gibson 1:00 0-4 -4
Merritt, Douglass, Lee, Shepherd, Gibson :26 0-0 0
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Novak, Sims 4:01 3-7 -4
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Harris, Sims 2:24 1-2 -1
Grady, Lee, Harris, Novak, Sims 1:03 3-3 0
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Harris, Gibson :08 1-0 +1
Total 60:00 51-66 -15

Individual players:
(First 6 minutes of game action not charted)

Manny Harris 34min -12
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/1 1/1 1
Midrange 1 0/2 2**
3-point 1/2 1/2

Manny had what can only be described as the least shitty day of anyone on the team.

Laval Lucas-Perry 27min -2
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1
Midrange 0/1 1/2 1
3-point 0/1 0/2

Had a poor day from beyond the arc, but did some other things that worked.

Zack Novak 33min -9
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1/1
Midrange
3-point 1/2

Had a good day rebounding the ball.

DeShawn Sims 31min -9
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1 0/1 0/2 1
Midrange 0/1 0/2
3-point 0/2 0/1

Awful, awful day. All of the shots he made were in the first 6 minutes.

Kelvin Grady 30min -4
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/1
Midrange 1/1
3-point 0/1 0/3

Poor effort from three, but did a lot of setting other guys up.

Zack Gibson 9min -6
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1/1
Midrange 1/2 0/1
3-point

Showed that he is almost entirely ineffective when the other team has some good bigs to go against.

Stu Douglass 12min -13
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange 0/1
3-point 0/1 0/1 1/2

Blerg.

CJ Lee 14min -8
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/1
Midrange
3-point 0/1

Bad day shooting, but did the standard CJ Lee other things to be a steady presence.

David Merritt 10min -11
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/1
Midrange 0/1
3-point

Mediocre to bad day.

What This Says…

DeShawn Sims struggled against a lineup with actual size. When he struggles, Michigan has major trouble getting anything going offensively for any consistent period of time. Kelvin Grady and Laval Lucas-Perry had by far the best performances in terms of differential.

Posted under Analysis, Basketball

People who shouldn’t be allowed on the internet: Joel Bradley

I hesitated to post this article, but it’s so damn bad that I couldn’t help myself. Like, horrendously stupid, and Joel Bradley should be kept far, far away from keyboards for the rest of his life.

Okay, I have been waiting for Rich Rodriguez to make a splash in recruiting for two years.

All he has produced is Michael Shaw, who will be a solid contributor next season, and Tate Forcier, who is a virtual lock as the starting signal-caller.

OK, so now you understand exactly how stupid “analysis” on the internet can be. Last year alone Rodriguez landed the following: Martavious Odoms (led the team in receptions and receiving yards as a true freshman), Brandon Smith (expected to start at strong safety as a redshirt freshman, and would have played last year if he hadn’t had an appendectomy shortly before the season began), Terrence Robinson (expected to start at slot receiver as a redshirt freshman, and would have gotten serious playing time last year save a preseason injury), Patrick Omameh (an offensive lineman from Columbus who picked the Wolverines over Ohio State), Ricky Barnum (a former Florida commitment who is expected to start along the offensive line as a redshirt freshman). He landed several other players as well, but those are the highlights of his first recruiting class.

His second class? Michigan is currently ranked #8 in the nation by Rivals.com, #13 by Scout.com, with plenty of scholarships (as many as 8) still to hand out.

And I can’t pass up this gem:

Sam McGuffie would have been as good as Jacob Hester was his junior year at LSU. to Carlos Brown may not even get used at all as a feature back under the new regime.

Yes, speed back Sam McGuffie was exactly the same type of player as NFL fullback Jacob Hester. Carlos Brown was injured this entire year (like his entire career thus far), and got a chance to star against Northwestern. If you ever run across Joel Bradley on the street, please inflict as much physical harm on him as possible. Some people shouldn’t be allowed on the internet, much less given a platform to spew their idiocy. There is s ton more stupid in the article if you’re interested in torturing yourself.

Mr. Bradley, thy name is FAIL.

Posted under Coaching, Football, Recruiting

All-Star Updates

I had originally planned to include this information as part of a regular recruiting post, but there was just too much to fit it all in one place.

The rosters for the annual Big 33 All-Star game (Ohio v. Pennsylvania) have been announced. Your players of interest:

Pennsylvania:
LB Dan Mason

Ohio:
WR/Ath Micah Hyde
RB Commit Fitzgerald Toussaint
OL Marcus Hall
CB Mike Edwards
CB/S Commit Justin Turner
S/LB Commit Isaiah Bell

The game will be played June 20th in Hershey, PA. Last year’s game had highlights (most notably of Michigan freshman Michael Shaw) available on the internet, so keep an eye out.

While we’re on the topic of All-stars, the first 10 players for the Army All-American Bowl in 2010 were announced at the combine, and they are:

Markeith Ambles of Henry County (McDonough, Ga.); Dillon Baxter of Mission Bay (San Diego); Robert Crisp of Chapel Hill (N.C.); Michael Dyer of Little Rock Christian; Jake Heaps of Skyline (Sammamish, Wash.); Malcolm Jones of Oaks Christian (Westlake, Calif.); Marcus Lattimore of Byrnes (Duncan, S.C.); Christian Lombard of Fremd (Palatine, Ill.); Chris Martin of Bishop O’Dowd (Oakland); and Lache Seastrunk of Temple (Texas).

Baxter is committed to USC, Lombard is committed to Notre Dame (has nobody shown him their track record for destroying the careers of talented offensive linemen over the past four years?). All of the other prospects are included on the recruiting board already, except Ambles, who has now been added as a wide receiver (slot). Ambles, Crisp, Dyer, Lattimore, and Seastrunk are probably going to be very serious Michigan targets. Jones may be a USC commit, though I believe that article is simply mistaken.

Posted under Football, Recruiting

Illinois 66, Michigan 51

As this game was drawing to a close, Paul asked me, “can we just stay at, like #26 all year?” It was a good wish, as it seems every time the Michigan basketball team has  had even a little pressure to perform, the team has failed to show up in a big game. First it was the home game against Wisconsin, then the Indiana near-debacle, and now this.

Of course, despite being the ranked team in the contest, Michigan wasn’t favored to win this game. Any Michigan fan expecting a victory was likely being a little too exuberant. Illinois is a good team, and beating them on their home court was probably a little too much to ask. Still, the way the game unfolded was disappointing. Michigan was able to at least play it even with the Illini throughout the first half, going into the break with a 1-point lead.

Then, the wheels came off. Michigan couldn’t hit a shot, various Illinois players got/remained hot (primarily Mike Tisdale), the Wolverines had trouble getting much of anything going on ofense, and ended up heading back to ann Arbor with a 15-point loss.

DeShawn Sims was a huge disappointment in this game, as he had a lot of trouble getting much of anything working. CJ Lee and David Merritt played more minutes than most Michigan fans were comfortable with, and Manny Harris did many of the frustrating things he’s developed as key parts of his game. Both freshmen were near-invisible, though Zack Novak did a good job rebounding from the 4 position against a much taller Illinois squad.

There were positives, however. On top of Novak’s inexplicable rebounding ability, there were flashes of aggressive brilliance from the defense, and Michigan managed to take a heavily favored team into the break with a lead. However, this Michigan team is now past moral victories, and needs to match effort with results.

UFR tomorrow afternoon.

Posted under Football

Why Michigan 2008 isn’t Nebraska 2004

The first in a series of dispelling comparisons to other historically bad teams at major college football programs. If you have a suggestion of a team with whom to compare the 2008 Wolverines, leave it in the comments.

In 2004, Nebraska’s legendary football team was under the tutelage of first-year coach Bill Callahan. Callahan was replacing Frank Solich, who was a lifer in Nebraska, first coaching high school there, then being an assistant for 19 years under legend Tom Osborne, before replacing him in 1998. Solich was a multi-time Coach of the Year finalist, but after the huskers faded in 2002 and 2003, he was fired when AD Steve Pederson infamously stated “I refuse to let the program gravitate into mediocrity.”

This sounds similar to, if not quite the same as Lloyd Carr’s departure from Michigan. After several strong years with the program, the final days of his tenure saw 7-5 and 9-4 seasons, bookending an 11-2 year, and highlighted by losses to Minnesota and Appalachian State. Carr, though he was the protege of a legend, has become something of a Michigan legend himself, and left the Wolverines on his own term through retirement, rather than being fired and returning to the sidelines in Athens, Ohio.

Now that we’ve seen Rodriguez and Callahan entered their respective schools with somewhat similar situations, let’s take a look at what each man did before. Prior to becoming the headman in Lincoln, Bill Callahan had been an offensive line coach for Wisconsin in the early 90s, before becoming a coach in the NFL for 10 years. He was cited as an offensive genius in the west coast system, becoming offensive coordinator and eventually head coach for the Oakland Raiders. After two years as the Raiders’ had coach, Callahan was fired after going 4-12 in 2003. Rich Rodriguez’s situation here is entirely different. Rod has never coached in the NFL, and has been a head coach at nearly every college level. Most importantly, Rodriguez has never been fired for lack of performance by his teams. He has won at every single coaching stop.

In their first year at their respective schools, both men failed to achieve a bowl – which the fans, alumni, and administration found to be unacceptable. Even in the previous coaches’ worst years (a 7-7 effort in 2002 for Solich, and a 7-5 2005 for Carr), they had managed to make it to bowls, though neither won. Both were trying to install new offensive systems, coincidentally going in opposite directions (Callahan replacing the option with a pro-style offense, and Rodriguez replacing a pro-style offense with option schemes). The Nebraska offense was a cornerstone of their program, and even ingrained into the state identity. Was Michigan’s pro-style offense the same way?

The fundamental difference between Callahan and Rodriguez is an inability (or lack of desire) by Callahan to embrace tradition and run his team like an NFL franchise. Rodriguez, for all his faults, has done everything he can to try not to step on the traditions of Michigan, even if he’s needed a little prodding at times. He invited the 1968 team to speak to his Wolverines this summer, in contrast to Callahan’s ordering the removal of all the All-American plaques from Nebraska’s football offices. Even if Rodriguez doesn’t quite know all of Michigan’s traditions, he understands that they are important in the college game, and is trying to catch up as fast as he can.

Michigan is also upgrading its football program in numerous ways concurrently with the takeover of the Rodriguez administration. New facilities are going up, luxury boxes are being added to Michigan Stadium, and Rodriguez himself replaced a stagnant weight training program with one of the nation’s best Strength and Conditioning Coordinators in Mike Barwis.

In 2004, Nebraska as a program changed its whole identity. However, unlike the Huskers, I Michigan’s change is far more likely to be successful.

Posted under Coaching, Football

Illinois Preview

Or: Tim’s foray into tempo-free statistics.

Tonight, for the second time in 10 days, Michigan will take on Illinois in Big Ten basketball action. The game is a 8:30 PM Eastern  tonight in Urbana-Champaign, and can be seen live on Big Ten Network.

Tempo-Free and efficiency comparison (if you need an explanation of what any of these things mean, head to KenPom’s website):

Michigan v. Illinois: National Ranks
Category Michigan Illinois Advantage
Mich eFG% v. Illinois eFG% D 53 38 I
Mich eFG% D v. Illinois eFG% 98 35 I
Mich TO% v. Illinois Def TO% 3(!) 34 M
Mich Def TO% v. Illinois TO% 146 72 I
Mich OReb% v. Illinois DReb% 261 157 II
Mich DReb% v. Illinois OReb% 188 216 M
Mich FTR v. Illinois Opp FTR 289 23 III
Mich Opp FTR v. Illinois FTR 8 343 MMMM
Mich AdjO v. Illinois AdjD 21 16
Mich AdjD v. Illinois AdjO 131 33 I

Differences of more than 100 places in the rankings garner two-letter advantages, differences of more than 200 get a third. In free throw rate, Michigan has earned the as-yet-unprecedented 4th letter.

Illinois is a good basketball team. Of course, Michigan somehow managed to knock them off less than two weeks ago, so this game certainly isn’t unwinnable. Still, home court advantage is huge in the Big Ten, and from the looks of things, Michigan may have just gotten lucky in Crisler last time. The key when Illinois has the ball is limiting the number of god shots the Illini get. Michigan must keep the Illinois effective field goal percentage down if they want a chance to win. The Illini have a slight advantage in this area, but that includes ridiculous shooting nights by the likes of Savannah State and Indiana, where the shots weren’t really open, they just happened to fall. On the other end of the court, Michigan must get some good shots of their own. The offense works best when DeShawn Sims is able to shoot not only inside the lane, but also from midrange to open up the arc for the likes of Laval Lucas-Perry and Zack Novak. Manny Harris must continue trying to get to the line, and not get frustrated if he doesn’t get the calls early in the game. When that happened in the Wisconsin game, he unwisely kept trying what wasn’t working instead of dishing to more open teammates. Turnover margin should also play a role in this game. Michigan was forcing turnovers out of the 1-3-1 and man looks against the Hawkeyes, though I think the 1-3-1 is a better turnover-producing set. Of course, playing the 1-3-1 is heavily contingent on making shots (as pointed out after the Indiana game by commenter Mr. Ostrander), so again eFG% is important. Ken Pomeroy predicts a 70-61 Illinois win in a 60-possession game. He gives the Wolverines a 16% chance of winning the game.

Illinois is led by Trent Meachem, Demitri McCamey, Chester Frazier, and Mike Davis. Each of those four guys plays 70% or more of the team’s minutes, so getting them in foul trouble – which again leads me to believe Michigan should try to score in the lane in this game – would be helpful. Meachem is the team’s biggest three-point threat, while the 6-10 Davis is primarily an inside scorer. Newly-eligible (following his transfer from Kentucky) is Alex Legion, who has gotten plenty of playing time in Big Ten games. He also forced Zack Novak to get 6 stitches last time these teams squared off.

Call me crazy, but I think with Illinois’s size (3 players over 6-10, and another at 6-7), I think Jevohn Shepherd may get a bit of playing time in this game, if only for his athleticism on defense and to absorb a few fouls to keep DeShawn Sims and Zack Gibson out of trouble. Michigan should also be able to get by on their quickness against a bigger Illinois team.

The Wolverines are the underdog yet again, and this game isn’t a must-win, but it certainly would be nice to get the first 2-game season sweep of the year.

Posted under Analysis, Basketball

Spring is almost upon us

Rich Rodriguez announced last week that Michigan’s Spring Game will be returning to Michigan Stadium. This year’s intrasquad, to be played April 11th, will once again be open to the public. This is obviously a major step forward for the program, after last year’s final practice was closed, and held at nearby Saline High School.

Now that things are on the right path, I humbly offer a few suggestions to the athletic department the ensure this year’s game is a success.

  • Have a real game with normal scoring. None of this “offense v. defense, a sack is 2 points for the defense, a first down is worth half a point…”-type nonsense. A spring game is for the fans, and so let’s not make it confusing to follow. Figure out a way to get it done (I suggest first teams v. second teams, but there are a number of other ways to get this done).
  • If there are going to be activities other than a game, make them interesting. Florida has the players race each other (and students who want to try their hand at beating the likes of Percy Harvin). Michigan has players run through drills that fans don’t get. Which do you think is more interesting to observers?
  • Invite every high school coach in the state, and most from Ohio. Encourage them to bring their teams. Invite every single prospect that has been identified for the classes of 2010 and 2011. I don’t care if they’re from Florida, Hawaii, or Timbuktu. If they want to come, they will. If it’s too far, they won’t. What does it hurt to extend an invitation? Since there’s guaranteed to be less media covering the spring game (regardless of who is invited), allow the recruits to stay on the sidelines during the scrimmage – something they cant do during an actual game.
  • Have a festival-like atmosphere, or at least treat it like a game. Have tailgating, the Victors Walk, contests, concessions. Have the whole band and the whole cheerleading squad in attendance. Bring in forme (or current) NFL players to call plays. Invite College Gameday to Ann Arbor (they were in Gainesville last year) – or at least whatever BTN’s version of GameDay is. Invite all the media that cover the team during the regular season – go out of your way to make sure they know they are welcome.
  • If it’s cold, have a pep rally in Crisler before the game. If not, hold it in the stadium. Have Coach Rod speak to the crowd.
  • Give tours of parts of Michigan Stadium fans have never seen. Considering all the construction, that could just be whatever has been completed since November 15th. Let them in the locker room, or Junge (unless it’s being used for recruiting) or the press box.

As for fans? Well, they just need to show up, have fun (regardless of the weather), and maybe have a tailgate or two. If there’s one thing fans can do to help the team for next season, it’s showing they still care about and love the Michigan Wolverines, and maybe build a little confidence for the players and coaches going into ’09.

What ideas do YOU have to improve the spring game? Leave them in the comments, and I’ll post a roundup/revision post as spring practice begins. Maybe the best suggestion will get a prize… Anybody interested in a DVD set? There’s a copy of The Rivalry Series: Michigan Beats Ohio State up for grabs.

Posted under Football, Recruiting, Spring Coverage

Recruiting Update 1-13-09

Recruiting boards are in the top box on the left sidebar.

Added to the Board:
2010 OH CB/Ath Braylon Heard. He says Penn State and USC are his favorites, and though he doesn’t mention Michigan in the article, I’m sure the Wolverines are interested. He has a good first name for Michigan, and a fairly rad highlight video, as well as an equally good one from his sophomore year.
2010 NJ OL Bill Bilo. Interested in Michigan (info in header/obvious from posting on GBW front page).
2010 HI LB VJ Fehoko. Michigan is corresponding with him, and he seems like a good one – other schools of interest are Alabama, Oklahoma, and Notre Dame. Texas Tech is his current favorite.

Michigan so impressed OH OL Marcus Hall on his visit that he has a new leader (info in header). I wonder who that could be? OSU insiders think Michigan’s lead is ephemeral, but a Glenville product even naming the Wolverines his favorite this late in the process is a huge leap forward for recruiting from that Buckeye pipeline.

FL CB Adrian Witty was similarly impressed on his Michigan visit, but GBW doesn’t even try to play it coy this time, and the info is blatantly in the header. Michigan is by far his biggest offer (only others, to my knowledge, are FIU and KSU), and if HS teammate QB Denard Robinson wants to play with his friend in college, Michigan is their only option.

Tennessee is the favorite for 2009 OH CB Mike Edwards from Cleveland Glenville. The Vols are giving him the full-court press, solidifying their #1 status. He apparently has his Michigan visit this weekend, however, giving the Wolverines a chance to catch up.

Miami of Florida has entered the fray for 2009 SC OL Quinton Washington. Likely the top OL prospect left on Michigan’s board, Q looks to take all of his visits before reaching a decision.

Tennessee coaches (including Kiffin the elder and DaCoachO) were in Louisiana last week to visit 2009 DT Commit DeQuinta Jones and his teammate, WR Rueben Randle. I would assume (and, obviously, hope) that their visit was more targeted towards Randle than Jones.

You can all-but cross 2009 FL CB Jayron Hosley off the board. Following a USF visit, the USF Scout affiliate publishes an article entitled “Jayron Knows Where He’s Going.” Hmm, I wonder where that could be. He still takes his Michigan visit this weekend, though he’s bound to hate the weather.

2009 PA LB Dan Mason say’s he’s “pretty much narrowed things down to Pitt and West Virginia.” Michigan isnt even mentioned as one of the schools that just didn’t make the cut. He’ll stay on the board for now, as I assume a Michigan offer would put the Wolverines right into the conversation.

SC DE Sam Montgomery enjoyed his Michigan visit:

“I’m high on Michigan right now. They are two steps ahead of everybody. But I’ll wait and make my decision after all the visits.”

Don’t get your hopes too high though, as he has something of a reputation for aying great things about whichever school he’s heard from or visited most recently. If he’s still making such positive comments after his LSU visit, that will be notable. And here’s a little more on his upcoming timetable:

In the next month, Montgomery will take official visits to LSU, Tennessee, Oregon and North Carolina. While Montgomery won’t take official visits to South Carolina and Clemson, he said the in-state schools are still in the mix.

Montgomery said he plans not to announce a commitment. Rather, he said he will announce where he’ll attend college when he signs his national letter of intent.

2009 FL WR Nu’Keese Richardson said Michigan was among his favorites before he committed to Florida in the summer. Is he opening up his recruitment? If so, he has a chance to be re-added to the board later. Keep an eye on ‘Keese for now.

Mgoblog is obviously very awesome, and if you visit this site, you’re undoubtedly a regular reader over there as well. For that reason, I typically won’t link directly to Brian’s info, as it stands on its own. However, in TomVH’s Tate Forcier interview earlier this week, there was some pertinent info on 2010 CA RB Brennan Clay, a high school teammate of Forcier.

TOM: Your teammate, Brennan Clay, is a Michigan target for next year. Is there anything you’ve said to him about joining you, or is there anything you’ll do in the future?

TATE: I’ve been working on him since day one. He’s getting a lot of attention, he just got offered by USC last week. I want what’s best for him, but I have a good feeling if he was going to come back east, this would be a school he could choose. He’s going to come out for spring ball, so hopefully I can convince him. I know he loves Coach Smith and Rodriguez, and he likes Michigan. Talking with those guys is like extended family, they’re just really cool guys, which helps.

Brennan is far from a lock to Michigan, especially with early offers from schools like USC. Michigan certainly has help in the recruitment, though, and it seems (as evidenced by said USC offer) that Clay will be a top prospect in next year’s class. For the rest of the Forcier interview, head to Mgoblog.

2010 MI RB Austin White has been the subject of some transfer rumors lately. However, his dad says he is staying at Livonia Stevenson instead of transferring to Inkster High School.

2010 Michigan Football Recruit Austin White“As far as we’re concerned, Austin, honestly, is at Livonia Stevenson,” he said. “If we felt there was an academic program strong enough for Austin and he may benefit from being in a quality program, then we will do what’s best for him. But there’s no issue as to why we would be looking or searching outside.”

“They have a good education program. Obviously, the only other place I would like to see Austin is where I’m at, and that would be Pioneer, and I know they have outstanding academics and a strong football program.

“But I can almost guarantee you that Austin would go in the total opposite direction of his dad.”

Mr. White is the principal at Pioneer. The Inskter transfer rumors started because Stevenson’s coach has resigned, and Austin would likely seek a good football program with a good, strict coach (the as-yet-unconfirmed rumor has it that he participated in the MSU Football/Hockey fight that got one of his older twin brothers kicked of MSU’s football team). Inkster’s head coach has a reputation for being a so-called “molder of men.” Obviously, either transfer situation (Inkster or AA Pioneer) would be positive for Michigan.

Posted under Football, Recruiting

Upon Further Review: Iowa

The raw data is available in .xls format here. On individual player charts, the time played is now from the boxscore, rather than adding up to the second each player’s time played.

Half 1

1st half differential
Lineup Time on Floor Score Differential
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 8:03 12-4 +8
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Gibson 3:19 7-8 -1
Douglass, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Novak, Gibson 1:36 0-2 -2
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Gibson, Sims :25 1-0 +1
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Harris, Sims 3:34 5-0 +5
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 3:03 7-2 +5
Total 20:00 32-16 +16

Half 2

2nd half differential
Lineup Time on Floor Score Differential
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 4:10 9-8 +1
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Gibson 1:32 3-3 0
Grady, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Gibson 1:18 0-2 -2
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims :52 4-0 +4
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims :12 0-0 0
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Novak, Sims 1:40 4-0 +4
Merritt, Douglass, Lee, Harris, Sims 1:26 4-2 +2
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 3:36 5-4 +1
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Gibson 1:45 0-4 -4
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Novak, Gibson 1:31 0-5 -5
Grady, Lee, Wright, Shepherd, Puls 1:11 0-2 -2
Grady, Douglass, Wright, Shepherd, Puls :47 3-3 0
Total 20:00 32-33 -1

Game totals

Lineup Totals
Lineup Time on Floor Score Differential
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 16:08 32-14 +18
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 3:36 5-4 +1
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Harris, Sims 3:34 5-0 +5
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Gibson 3:19 7-8 -1
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Gibson 3:17 3-7 -4
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Novak, Sims 1:40 4-0 +4
Douglass, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Novak, Gibson 1:36 0-2 -2
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Novak, Gibson 1:31 0-5 -5
Merritt, Douglass, Lee, Harris, Sims 1:26 4-2 +2
Grady, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Gibson 1:18 0-2 -2
Grady, Lee, Wright, Shepherd, Puls 1:11 0-2 -2
Grady, Douglass, Wright, Shepherd, Puls :47 3-3 0
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Gibson, Sims :25 1-0 +1
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims :12 0-0 0
Total 60:00 64-49 +15

Individual players:

Manny Harris 32min +14
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/1 0/1 3/4 3*
Midrange 0/1
3-point 0/1 2/3

He got an and-1 on one of those fouls in the lane. Manny did what he needs to do for the team, though his hesitation in putting up 3s has really started to annoy me.

Laval Lucas-Perry 29min +17
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1/1 1
Midrange 0/2
3-point 1/2

Showed some flashes of being able to get to the hoop and draw contact. That will be important down the stretch.

Zack Novak 33min +9
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange 0/1
3-point 0/1 0/1 1/2

Didn’t shoot the ball much, but he made some defensive plays (along the lines of CJ Lee), and did a good job rebounding, considering he’s 6-5 and playing power forward.

DeShawn Sims 27min +31(!)
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/2 1/2 4/4 1*
Midrange 0/1 1/3 1/1
3-point 1 0/1

It seemed ike he took (and made) a ton more midrange shots than he actually apparently did. Pretty good day, though he didn’t pull in double-digit boards.

Kelvin Grady 28min +11
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1/1
Midrange 0/1
3-point 0/1 1/1 1/2

Did what he needs to do. Actually nailed a layup.

Zack Gibson 11min -13(!)
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/2 1/1
Midrange 0/1
3-point 0/1

Struggled mightily If this is how he plays with almost no post presence on the other team, how will he compete against Goran Suton? BJ Mullens?

Eric Puls 2min -2
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange
3-point 1/1

WOOO PULS!

Stu Douglass 12min -2
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1/1
Midrange
3-point 0/1 0/1

Didn’t nail his 3-balls, and his only make was an easy layup on a good cut.

CJ Lee 11 min +5
Location 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1/1
Midrange
3-point 0/1 0/1

Scrappy, former walk-on, etc. Did a lot more than shoot.

What This Says…

Douglass and Gibson are the only guys who played actual minutes (i.e. not garbage time) who logged negative differentials. I think this surprises nobody. Gibson really struggled today, and Douglass is the lesser of the two freshmen.

This team has so much more success when they don’t take all their shots from three. DeShawn Sims is a major weapon from midrange, and both Manny (obviously) and LLP are able to get to the hoop and draw contact, if not just get their score on. CJ Lee was the team’s MVP, though, despite an unspectacular differential. He made hustle plays left and right, most of which won’t show up in the boxscore.

The story of the day was not the offense (rendering this little exercise at least partially moot), but the stellar defense that the team played. The 1-3-1 forced myriad turnovers, and the team was able to get a few in man as well. They were really playing tenaciously, and I think when they have some success on the offensive side of the court, it inspires them to play better defense (in addition to allowing them to play more 1-3-1).

Posted under Analysis, Basketball