//

UFR: Wisconsin II

The shooting data can be found in .xls format here, and the differential data can be found in the multi-game UFR post from earlier this week.

Individual Players

Stu Douglass 29min -8
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange 0/1
3-pt 0/1 0/1 1/1

Made a couple gritty white guy plays (normally the domain of Novak), but didn’t shoot well against the Badgers’ suffocating perimeter defense.

Zack Gibson 6min +2
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange
3-pt 1/1

Actually played very well. Against a Wisconsin team with lots of tall white guys, I wish he would have gotten more run.

Manny Harris 38min 0
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/1 1/2 0/1
Midrange 0/1 2/4 1/1
3-pt 1 0/1 1/4

Has a really tough time when the officiating tends to let them play. Of course, that was the standard on one end of the floor for most of the game.

CJ Lee 32min +6
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1/1
Midrange 0/1
3-pt 2/3

Actually a very good day, considering the only “1” was when Manny screwed him over in a low-clock situation. The differential is also quite good for a 5-point loss.

Laval Lucas-Perry 11min +3
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange
3-pt 0/1 1/1

Didn’t get a ton of minutes, but shot a little better than we’ve come to expect (sad that “better than expected” has become 50% on open 3s).

Zack Novak 34min -1
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1/1
Midrange 0/1
3-pt 0 1/2

Didn’t step up as the big third guy, but played admirably against players much taller than he is.

Jevohn Shepherd 0min
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange
3-pt

DNP – coach’s decision.

DeShawn Sims 36min -10
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1 1/2 1/1 1/1 1/2
Midrange 1/1 1/4 2/2
3-pt 0/3 0/1

The three-point shooting is bad (though most of them were chucks at the end), and the 1/4 from midrange on makeable shots is uncharacteristic, but think how much more effective Sims could have been with a legit bigman by his side.

David Merritt 9min -9
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange 0/1
3-pt 0/1

Limited playing time, limited effectiveness.

Kelvin Grady 1min -2
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange
3-pt

Hardly played at all.

From the differentials, it would appear that point guard play by anyone not named “CJ Lee” was an issue in this game. I’d say this was the case, though I think Grady needs to get minutes in order to be effective as anything other than a press-breaker or spot-up shooter. The Wisconsin defense was pretty good throughout the game, and Michigan’s lack of size really hurt. It’s easy to see how this team will improve next year.

Posted under Analysis, Basketball

Comments Off on UFR: Wisconsin II

Tags: ,

Inaugural 2010 Big Ten Recruiting Class Rankings

With most Big Ten teams already sporting at least one commit, it’s time to break out the recruiting class rankings once more. This year, I’ve expanded to include multiple sites’ opinions of each player, though they are listed in order from most to least credible. As Rivals and ESPN release their initial rankings, I’ll update.

For a couple reason (junior days at multiple schools, and the fact that it’s Selection Sunday), no recruiting rankings next Sunday. If there’s reason to, I may publish some later next week instead. The charts should also look prettier in coming weeks.

Ohio State – 4 commits
Name Pos Rivals Scout ESPN
Andrew Norwell OL NR ***** NR
JT Moore DE NR **** NR
Jamel Turner DE NR **** NR
David Durham LB NR NR NR

Lots of highly-ranked guys, al in-state for the Buckeyes. Turner is expected to have 5-star potential.

Notre Dame – 3 commits
Name Pos Rivals Scout ESPN
Christian Lombard OL NR ***** NR
Chris Martin DE NR ***** NR
Daniel Smith WR NR **** NR

Strong start to the class. It will be interesting to see where it ends up if the Irish have another weak season.

Michigan – 3 commits
Name Pos Rivals Scout ESPN
Ricardo Miller WR NR **** NR
Jerald Robinson WR NR NR NR
Jeremy Jackson WR NR NR NR

All these guys are expected to end up in the four-star range.

Penn State – 2 commits
Name Pos Rivals Scout ESPN
Mike Hull LB NR **** NR
Paul Jones QB NR **** NR

A couple good in-state commits for the Nittany Lions.

Minnesota – 3 commits
Name Pos Rivals Scout ESPN
Jimmy Gjere OL NR NR NR
Antoine Lewis CB NR NR NR
Konrad Zagzebski LB NR NR NR

Unlike past years, when Wisconsin would raid the top Minnesota talent, the Gophers are starting to cross the border the other way.

Michigan State – 1 commit
Name Pos. Rivals Scout ESPN
Max Bullough LB NR NR NR

Bullough is expected to end up as a 4-star.

Illinois – 1 commit
Name Pos. Rivals Scout ESPN
Corey Cooper CB NR NR NR

A single in-state commit.

Iowa – 1 commit
Name Pos. Rivals Scout ESPN
James Morris LB NR NR NR

I estimate that He’ll be lower-rated than Illinois’s lone commit, but that’s just a wild-ass guess from me.

Indiana, Northwestern, Purdue, Wisconsin – 0 commits.

Posted under Football, Recruiting

UFR: Purdue II

Boy, it sure is easier finishing one of these coming off a big win (Minnesota) and UFRing a big win (Purdue, obviously), than doing one of a heartbreaking loss (Iowa) while anticipating a make-or-break game. The shooting data can be founf in .xls format here, and the differential data can be found in the multi-game UFR post from earlier this week.

Individual Players

Stu Douglass 31min +7
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1
Midrange
3-pt 1/1 1/2

Didn’t take a lot of shots (few players outside of Manny and DeShawn did), but did a decent job with the chances he did get.

Zack Gibson 6min -11
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange 1/1
3-pt

Only played a couple minutes because DeShawn Sims was amazing. His differential is awful for playing on a team that won by 9 points.

Manny Harris 35min +12
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/4 1/1 1/1 0/1
Midrange 2/3 1/3
3-pt 1/2 2/3

These numbers don’t look as good as Manny actually was.  A couple of those ‘1’s from the lane weren;t his fault (i.e. a tip-in attempt and an uncalled foul).

CJ Lee 14min +8
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1/1
Midrange
3-pt 1/1

Didn’t get as much playing time as he’s gotten accustomed to. It’s worth noting that CJ also missed several free throws in the game (he finished 1-4), including the front ends of two separate 1-and-1s.

Laval Lucas-Perry 8min -3
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/2
Midrange
3-pt

Didnt get much run, but showed off his ability to get into the lane at times in the first half. I still think he should be used on the dribble more often. He also had a couple assists off drives as well. If he’s used as a scoring threat, rather than just a shooting threat, it will open up the offense for the stars and the freshman sharpshooters.

Zack Novak 34min +13
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange 1/1 1
3-pt 0/1

For as much playing time as he got, Novak wasn’t used very much on offense. He still did the little things defensively (particularly in rebounding), which is commendable because Purdue has some pretty good size. Still, I wish it wasn’t all boom-or-bust with Zack and Douglass.

Jevohn Shepherd 10min -5
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/1 1
Midrange
3-pt 1/2

A fair amount of playing time against a big Purdue team, and he even got on the court at the same time as Novak in a couple instances. He still shows off his athleticism and lack of actual basketball skill simaultaneously.

DeShawn Sims 34min +21
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 3/3 3/3
Midrange 3/5 2/2 1/1
3-pt 1/2

Easily the star of the game, especially considering Purdue’s marked size advantage. I’ll let the scoreboard speak for itself.

David Merritt 17min 0
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange 1/1
3-pt 0/1

Got pretty good playing time, and didn’t need to shoot too much. 2 Assists, 0 turnovers, and 1 steal sounds good to me.

Kelvin Grady 11min +7
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange
3-pt 0/1

Clearly the best ballhandling option, but he’s not nearly the defender of someone like Lee, and he’s lost at times in the offense.

And?

Good performance. Anyone questioning whether the stars of this team were DeShawn Sims and Manny Harris (nobody?) certainly had their uncertainties answered in this game. The big two did most of the work, and let the role players just fill in when necessary.

Posted under Analysis, Basketball

Comments Off on UFR: Purdue II

Tags: ,

Preview: Minnesota II

Or: Tim’s foray into tempo-free statistics.

Michigan takes on the Minnesota Golden Gophers today at Noon (Eastern, 11AM local). The game, which is, like, super-important for tournament chances, can be seen live from The Barn on the ESPN machine.

Tempo-Free and efficiency comparison (if you need an explanation of what any of these things mean, head to KenPom’s website):

Michigan v. Minnesota: National Ranks
Category Michigan Minn (O) Advantage
Mich eFG% v. Minnesota eFG% D 142 55 O
Mich eFG% D v. Minnesota eFG% 179 141 O
Mich TO% v. Minnesota Def TO% 15 41 M
Mich Def TO% v. Minnesota TO% 151 246 M
Mich OReb% v. Minnesota DReb% 274 212 O
Mich DReb% v. Minnesota OReb% 163 63 O
Mich FTR v. Minnesota Opp FTR 321 159 OO
Mich Opp FTR v. Minnesota FTR 27 257 MMM
Mich AdjO v. Minnesota AdjD 57 19 O
Mich AdjD v. Minnesota AdjO 75 99 M

Differences of more than 100 places in the rankings garner two-letter advantages, differences of more than 200 get a third.

When Last We Met…

Michigan gave fans hope for a tourney berth (the one they’ve been dangling in front of us on a string attached to a fishing pole for much of the year), by blowing out Minnesota in a game that wasn’t even nearly as close as the 12-point margin would indicate. Zack Novak blew the roof off Crisler from distance, and the rest of the team wasn’t so shabby themselves. Manny was limited with some foul trouble, and Sims wasn’t a huge factor from the paint (see: Minnesota’s enormous, shot-blocking big men), but everyone stepped up to get the job done, including Kelvin Grady.

Since Last We Met…

Michigan dropped road games to Iowa and Wisconsin, sandwiched around beating Purdue in Crisler Arena. They have gotten generally better on offense (mostly on account of hot shooting days against the Gophers and Boilermakers), while also getting slightly better on defense (mostly because they owned the Gophers in Crisler).

Minnesota won home games over Northwestern and Wisconsin, while dropping a roadie to Illinois. The defense has improved significantly in that short range, while the offense, a point of complaint for Gophers fans for much of the year, has continued its slide. Perhaps importantly for this game, they’ve turned the ball over more than they had been, and forced fewer turnovers by opponents than they had been prior to the Michigan game. Their defensive rebounding percentage has improved ever so slightly from “abysmal,” and they’ve managed to maintain their #1 block percentage in the intermediary.

And…?

If Michigan can win this road game, they nearly have a berth locked up, unless they choke one away in the first round of the Big Ten Tournament. If Minnesota can win, they probably have earned themselves a berth as well. Needless to say, this game is huge for both teams. Sadly, I don’t see the Wolverines coming home with a win, especially considering their struggles away from home this year. HOWEVA, that isn’t to say all hope is lost. An inconsistent team can lose to anybody, but they can also beat anybody.

KenPom predicts a 66-61 Minneosta win in a 63-possession game. He gives Michigan just a 28% chance of emerging with the win in Williams Arena.

Posted under Analysis, Basketball

Comments Off on Preview: Minnesota II

Tags: ,

UFR: Iowa II

The shooting data can be founf in .xls format here, and the differential data can be found in the multi-game UFR post from earlier this week.

Individual Players

Stu Douglass 31min -19
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange
3-pt 4/7

Not a bad shooting game, but holy hell look at that terrible differential number.

Zack Gibson 4min -3
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange
3-pt

Didn’t get very much run at all. Had 1 legit and 1 crap moving screen go against him in the first half, and I think the foul trouble and the shaken confidence it gave him combined to keep him from playing too much.

Manny Harris 38min -1
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/2 0/2 2/2 0/1
Midrange 0/3 0/1
3-pt 0/2 1/1

His shooting wasn’t particularly bad, especially considering many of those misses in the paint should have been called fouls, but he made some really bad decisions. Way too many “1”s.

CJ Lee 36min -20
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 1
Midrange
3-pt 0/3

grumble grumble running set plays for CJ to shoot 3s grumble grumble. Also, the shifts in which he didn’t play were ALL positive except for one.

Laval Lucas-Perry 17min +6
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/1 0/1
Midrange 0/1
3-pt 1/3 0/1

Had a pretty good differential, but missed a few shots that he had absolutely no business missing. I’m coming to realize that he should be utilized more as a slasher in addition to a shooter (a role in which he’s recently struggled). And no, I’m not kidding.

Zack Novak 41min -13
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange 1/1
3-pt 1/1 1/2 1/4

Man, if this guy could just shoot as well every game as he did against Minnesota.

Jevohn Shepherd 3min +3
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange
3-pt

Surprisingly, he was one of the few people not in on a negative shift. Of course, that is largely because he barely played at al..

DeShawn Sims 32min +3
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane 0/1 0/1 2/2 1/1
Midrange 0/2 1/3 0/1
3-pt 1/3

Was a victim of the poor officiating (though not nearly as much as Manny), but other than that, had a lackluster day.

David Merritt 14min +3
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange
3-pt 1/2 0/1

grumble don’t shoot grumble. Played decently enough.

Kelvin Grady 0min
Quality 0 1 2 3 F
Lane
Midrange
3-pt

DNP – coach’s decision.

On the Officiating

After people’s reactions in the comments, I thought I might have been a bit harsh in my criticism of the officiating in this game. Upon further Review, I’m even madder than before. Of course, bad calls went both ways, but Michigan by far got the shorter end of the stick. I don’t want to become a boy who cried wolf, so I’m going to refrain from mntioning officiating in the future unless it’s particularly egregious (as it was in this game), but I stand by my previous comments that this game was one of the most poorly reffed I’ve seen all year – and that’s saying something.

Posted under Analysis, Basketball, Hockey, Misc.

Comments Off on UFR: Iowa II

Tags: ,

Differentials: Iowa, Wisconsin, Purdue

I haven’t had a chance to re-watch and score the data for these three games, but that shouldn’t prevent me from posting the (admittedly late) differential data. When I get a chance to grade the shooting, I’ll post those up as well.

Iowa

Half 1

1st Half
Lineup Time Score Differential
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 7:47 8-12 -4
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Gibson 1:10 0-2 -2
Lee, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Gibson :13 0-0 0
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Gibson :29 0-3 -3
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 2:05 6-3 +3
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Shepherd, Sims 1:42 2-0 +2
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 3:07 10-5 +5
Lee, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 2:27 3-3 0
Totals 20:00 29-28 +1

Half 2

2nd Half
Lineup Time Score Differential
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 6:45 5-9 -4
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Gibson 1:23 6-4 +2
Merritt, Douglass, Lee, Novak, Sims 2:21 3-3 0
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Shepherd, Sims 1:17 3-2 +1
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 1:05 2-0 +2
Lee, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 1:47 2-2 0
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 5:22 6-8 -2
Totals 20:00 21-22 -1

OT

Overtime
Lineup Time Score Differential
Merritt, Douglass, Lee, Novak, Sims 2:12 0-7 -7
Douglass, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Novak, Sims 2:48 4-7 -3
Totals 5:00 4-14 -10

Purdue

Half 1

1st Half
Lineup Time Score Differential
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 3:58 5-7 -2
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Shepherd, Sims 1:52 3-0 +3
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Shepherd, Gibson :38 1-0 +1
Merritt, Douglass, Novak, Shepherd, Gibson :46 0-0 0
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Novak, Shepherd, Gibson 2:17 5-8 -3
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Gibson :50 1-1 0
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 1:55 4-3 +1
Grady, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 2:39 5-3 +2
Grady, Douglass, Harris, Shepherd, Sims :24 0-0 0
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Shepherd, Sims 1:27 4-3 +1
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 3:14 9-9 0
Totals 20:00 37-34 +3

Half 2

2nd Half
Lineup Time Score Differential
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 3:08 9-5 +4
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 1:16 3-0 +3
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 2:49 9-7 +2
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Shepherd, Gibson :14 0-3 -3
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Shepherd, Gibson 1:49 0-4 -4
Grady, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 1:28 6-0 +6
Grady, Douglass, Lee, Novak, Sims 1:18 2-0 +2
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 5:10 13-11 +2
Grady, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 1:53 3-7 -4
Grady, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Gibson :10 0-2 -2
Grady, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims :18 3-3 0
Grady, Lee, Harris, Novak, Sims :27 2-0 +2
Totals 20:00 50-44 +6

Wisconsin

Half 1

1st Half
Lineup Time Score Differential
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 6:54 9-16 -7
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Gibson 1:47 5-2 +3
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Gibson, Sims 2:12 1-4 -3
Grady, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Novak, Sims 1:24 0-2 -2
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 4:59 13-2 +11
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Wright, Sims 2:44 6-6 0
Totals 20:00 34-32 +2

Half 2

2nd Half
Lineup Time Score Differential
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 4:26 2-7 -5
Merritt, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 4:06 0-6 -6
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 1:20 0-0 0
Lee, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Gibson 1:25 5-0 +5
Merritt, Lucas-Perry, Lee, Wright, Gibson :44 0-3 -3
Lee, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Wright, Sims :42 2-0 +2
Lee, Lucas-Perry, Harris, Novak, Sims 3:07 5-4 +1
Lee, Douglass, Harris, Novak, Sims 4:10 7-8 -1
Totals 20:00 21-28 -7

Individual differentials will be posted when I get the shooting data up; for now you can add them up yourself if you’re so inclined.

Posted under Analysis, Basketball

The Ballad of DeWayne Peace

A series exploring the commitments (and subsequent decommitments) of Michigan’s lost members of the class of 2009.

The Commitment
DeWayne Peace first burst onto the scene for Michigan fans when he attended the Rich Rodriguez Skills Camp in Ann Arbor over the summer of 2008. At the time, he had performed well at Kansas’s summer camp as well, and the Jayhawks were thought to be his heavy favorite. However, within a few weeks of visiting Michigan, Peace offered his verbal commitment to the Wolverines on June 25th. Peace was told that he would have an opportunity to prove himself as a wide receiver at Michigan, but that there was also a chance he would end up at defensive back. It was in the secondary that he had distinguished himself at camp, and where the coaching staff eventually saw him ending up.

The Decommitment
After more than 6 months of being committed to Michigan, and weeks of rumors, Peace withdrew his verbal commitment to Michigan on January 8th. Though Peace’s father reportedly insisted that DeWayne remain true to his word, in the end, he did not see himself playing for Michigan. The main reason behind this change of heart was a matter of position: the coaching staff wanted Peace to play corner, while he wanted be a wideout. It would follow logically (though it is unconfirmed, of course), that Peace was told he would play corner for Michigan or he would not play for Michigan at all.

The Impact
Obviously, the coaching staff realized that they weren’t as high on Peace as they had thought all along. If he was a highly-valued recruit, they wouldn’t have given him such an ultimatum, and he may have still ended up in Ann Arbor down the road. However, the coaching staff didn’t see much harm in shedding him from the class, and gave him the ultimatum. As Rodriguez himself said at his Signing Day Press Conference: “Sometimes a kid does you a favor when he decommits,” and Peace was likely one of these players. He ended up committing to the Wildcats of Arizona as a wide receiver.

Senior Year Stats

DeWayne Peace 2008
Game Rec Yds Yds/Rec TD Rush Yds Yds/Rush TD
Berkner 6 76 12.67 0 1 -7 -7.00 0
Martin 5 80 16.00 3 1 10 10.00 0
Summit 6 170 28.33 2 3 14 4.67 0
Northwest 5 66 13.20 2 2 63 31.50 1
Nimitz 5 65 13.00 0 5 40 8.00 2
Cedar Hill 6 49 8.17 0 4 21 5.25 0
Irving 5 36 7.20 1 6 9 1.50 0
Duncanville 6 27 4.50 0 10 45 4.50 0
MacArthur 1 21 21.00 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Prairie 5 70 14.00 1 0 0 0 0
Allen 2 27 13.5 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 52 687 13.21 9 32 195 6.09 3

Video

Posted under Football, Recruiting

Return of the Blogcast

In this Blogcast, Tim gives you an overview of all the new Wolverines. If you have any ideas for future blogcasts, let us know in the comments.

 
icon for podpress  Varsity Blue Podcast for 2/25/2009: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Posted under Blogcast, Personnel

Recruiting Update 3-3-09

Recruit Chris ParrTX RB Chris Parr, who I’d previously noted has something of a reputation of being a troublemaker, has landed himself in hot water again, this time beating up a 14-year old. I don’t want anything to do with the kid, and I’d assume the staff feels the same way. As far as character risks go, I don’t think this staff would take a kid like Parr, and certainly not while they have many other attractive options on their radar (and after the grief they’ve taken about Chris Henry and Pacman Jones since the move to Michigan). He’s been removed from the board, though I will admit he takes a good mugshot.

Florida has offered FL OL Leon Orr, and it sounds like that’s the place he really wants to end up. He hasn’t committed yet, but he gets an imaginary frowny face icon.

PA DE/LB Dakota Royer is starting to get his recruiting process squared away, and he has numerous offers as well as a list of favorites:

“It was very good … They are up there right now,” said Royer, who has offers from Maryland, Penn State, Colorado, Notre Dame, Illinois, Stanford, UConn, Michigan State, Kentucky and Rutgers.

“Maryland, Pitt, Penn State, Michigan State, Notre Dame — those are my top [schools],” he said.

No Michigan mention, in terms of interest from either side. However, I wouldn’t be surprised if he popped up on the Wolverine radar soon – if only to show Little Brother who’s boss.

KS DE/LB Geneo Grissom (already on the board) is indeed getting interest from Michigan. The linked article regards his attendance at the Jayhawks’ junior day.

TX LB caleb laveyAre you interested in the latest news on TX LB Caleb LaVey? Then CalebLavey.com is the website for you! His “Recruiting” page indicates he is receiving interest from Michigan (but he does not mention an offer), so he has been added to the board. I assume the site won’t be the most enlightening in terms of details about his recruitment (a la qbforce.com), but thus far it seems to be updated enough to be relevant, so hopefully his dad (who is listed as the contact, and I assume is the one operating the site) will update it frequently.

Michigan leads for PA CB Cullen Christian. They are far ahead of most of the competition, and he visits campus the weekend of March 19th. He has plans to set up visits with several other schools on his list, as well. Christian also thinks he won’t make a final decision until his senior season, giving those schools a chance to play catch-up.

It looks like I should be ready to remove SC DB DeAndre Hopkins from the board. It appears as though he’s highly likely to make a commitment to Clemson at their junior day this weekend. He’ll stay on the board for now in the event that the commitment doesn’t come to fruition.

Lastly, I want to mention (since I’ve been forgetting to do so since the news broke about 3 weeks ago) that FL WR Commit Ricardo Miller is planning to transfer out of Dr. Phillips High School in Orlando, and up to Ann Arbor Huron for his senior season. This, obviously, would unite him with fellow WR Commit Jeremy Jackson. That would be a pretty good tandem in the world of SE Michigan high school football. Speaking of Jackson, I found this interview of him on a random blog, whose credibility I can’t vouch for. Take it for what it’s worth.

Big Back Huntin’
With Brandon Minor graduating after the 2009 season, Michigan will likely be in search of another big, powerful back in his mold. Currently, Mike Cox is the only player on the roster who even comes close to being the style of running back that Minor is. Though all the rumblings out of last year’s team indicated that Cox was performing well with the scout team, Only having one bruiser on the roster might not be the most successful gameplan.

On that note, Michigan recently offered GA RB Mack Brown (Scout header confirms), as well as SC RB Marcus Lattimore. Both fit in the “big back” mold of Brandon Minor, though Lattimore is the more highly-regarded prospect at this time, and may be more of a complete all-around player. Speaking of Lattimore, until recently he had planned to announce his decision at the Army All-American game. Now, he has changed his mind and will wait the extra month or so until Signing Day. From the tenor of that article, it would appear that South Carolina is a heavy favorite.

There is also mutual interest between The Wolverines and CA RB Dietrich Riley (info in header). I’ve added him to the board, and he also fits the bill of “big back.” And last in the big back parade is TX RB Stephen Hopkins. The Wolverines are showing him interest (info in header). I wonder if they want an inside runner in this class. Hmm…

Posted under Football, Recruiting

Preview: Wisconsin II

Or: Tim’s foray into tempo-free statistics.

Michigan takes on the Badgers of Wisconsin at 2PM today (Eastern time, 1PM local). The game can be seen live from the Kohl Center on the Big Ten Network.

Tempo-Free and efficiency comparison (if you need an explanation of what any of these things mean, head to KenPom’s website):

Michigan v. Wisconsin: National Ranks
Category Michigan Wisconsin Advantage
Mich eFG% v. Wisconsin eFG% D 153 153
Mich eFG% D v. Wisconsin eFG% 169 111 W
Mich TO% v. Wisconsin Def TO% 18 255 MMM
Mich Def TO% v. Wisconsin TO% 157 5 WW
Mich OReb% v. Wiconsin DReb% 265 8 WWW
Mich DReb% v. Wisconsin OReb% 164 203 M
Mich FTR v. Wisconsin Opp FTR 318 64 WW
Mich Opp FTR v. Wisconsin FTR 27 224 MM
Mich AdjO v. Wisconsin AdjD 57 54
Mich AdjD v. Wisconsin AdjO 77 21 W

Differences of more than 100 places in the rankings garner two-letter advantages, differences of more than 200 get a third.

When Last We Met…

The slide began. The Wolverines dropped a 12-point game on their home floor, in which Zack Novak was easily the team’s MVP. Michigan was down the entire game, and by double digits through most of the second half. The game was at least as much of a blowout as the final score indicated.

Since Last We Met…

The Wolverines’ once-sure tourney bid has declined into a bubble that has moved inches closer to bursting ever since the demoralizing Badger loss. The team has struggled on offense since losing to Wisconsin, and instead has recently re-invented itself as something of a defensive unit (maybe not a stellar one, but good enough to win some games). Good wins like Illinois and Purdue have been interspersed with losses like Iowa and near-losses like Indiana. A 10-2 start has turned into an 8-9 slide ever since.

Wisconsin started out the season very strongly, but has also gone on something of a slide lately. They seem to have turned it around as a 6-game losing streak flipped over to a 5-game winning streak before succumbing to the Spartans a week ago in their last outing.

And…?

Both teams need this win to enhance their tournament resumes. If Michigan can come away with a big road win, they might be just one win in the Big Ten Tournament away from clinching their first ticket to the Big Dance since 1998. The Badgers are in similar situation, and have the home-court advantage in this one, a big advantage. Wisconsin is now solidly in the tournament, but a losing streak to end the season could be devastating.

KenPom predicts a 66-58 Wisconsin win in a 58-possession game. He gives Michigan just a 20% chance of emerging with the win in the Kohl Center.

Posted under Analysis, Basketball

Comments Off on Preview: Wisconsin II

Tags: ,